Search for: "State v. House" Results 9121 - 9140 of 28,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Wen Fa looks ahead to next week’s oral argument in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:29 am
  And, just now, the 2 men issued this joint statement:The United States cannot afford another four years of the Obama White House, which is what Hillary Clinton represents. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
"It is housed inside a state-of-the-art green building owned by the Center for Resilient Cities, a Madison nonprofit. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am by Ilya Somin
" Her endorsement of a relatively narrow definition of "public use" that excludes private "economic development" takings is at odds with her opinion for the Court in Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
The property was a mid terrace Victorian house on 3 levels (basement, ground and first). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
The property was a mid terrace Victorian house on 3 levels (basement, ground and first). [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm by Giles Peaker
Suffice it to say at this juncture that the law is settled in this area: the Supreme Court having reconsidered the requirement that all tenancies must be for a term certain, and giving the rule renewed (if, it must be said, grudging) approval in Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford(2012) 1 AC 955. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 3:26 pm by David Klein
As our readership knows, the Florida State legislature passed House Bill 761 (“HB 761”) on May 4, 2023. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am by Brietta Clark
Texas, two individuals and 18 states are once again asking the Supreme Court to do what it refused to do eight years ago in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
  It really goes back to Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2001] 1 AC 406, in which the House of Lords held that occupiers of a short-life accommodation which had been licensed to L&Q were found to have a tenancy by estoppel, from which certain rights (e.g. to repair) emanated. [read post]