Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 13,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2009, 3:39 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:16 pm
The 2009 Florida case Embry v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 3:29 am
Supreme Court has ruled in the famous Brady v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
” As a public sector lawyer, Shawn has worked as a Washington State Assistant Attorney General (Education Division), Evergreen State College Legal Counsel, Washington State Senate Staff Counsel (Senate Committee Services) and as a Public Defender. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:15 am
(FLSA); see Goldberg v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Last month the First Judicial District Court of Appeal for Illinois reached its opinion in Ballard v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am
(As to where in the range between those two extremes, an enforcement court may land on, is something we leave open for development.) [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:40 am
v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
County of Contra Costa (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1464, 1466, 1468; SOCWA, supra, 196 Cal.App.4th at 1608, 1613, 1614, 1616; Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm
Even in the case of H3H3 v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am
Land use development projects include residential, commercial, industrial and public land uses and facilities. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 11:45 am
The state supreme court affirmed the appellate court’s reversal. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:51 am
The justices asked the U.S. solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Osage Wind v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 7:50 am
” Article 11.1 states: “For the benefit of present and future generations, the State and its political subdivisions shall conserve and protect Hawaii’s natural beauty and all natural resources, including land, water, air, minerals and energy sources, and shall promote the development and utilization of these resources in a manner consistent with their conservation and in furtherance of the self-sufficiency of the State. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:52 am
” The decision in Montana v. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am
McNamara, available here; see also the blog post by Julian Ku at Opinio Juris – I am obviously indebted to Opinio Juris for information on all these cases).Most recently, a case against the Club Med relating to the use of land expropriated by Cuba in 1960 was thrown out by the 11th Circuit under the act of state doctrine (Glen v. [read post]
