Search for: "State v. So"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 117,804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2013, 2:35 am
Para 352D does not cover the appellant’s case and cannot be held to do so. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am
Just as members need to show greater restraint, so should a president. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
And so Ms. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 9:39 am
Michelle Davis won in State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm
But the offenders in the cases before the Court would not be so lucky. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:42 am
In Zelaznik v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
That would infringe the rule in Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
Justice Kagan pressed Mooppan repeatedly to give a yes or no answer this question, but he resisted doing so. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Moreover, although courts should exercise caution in accepting new torts, it is legitimate to do so “where the interests are worthy of protection and the development is necessary to stay abreast of social change” (at para 50, citing Merrifield v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 205 (CanLII)). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 9:47 pm
So what happens next? [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Brinkley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm
If we accept the state’s argument that it’s an excise tax, then it’s probably an unconstitutional one, because it fails to meet the nexus requirements established in cases like Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
The State applied to or Courts of that State shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character or not. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Public Disclosure Commission v. 119 Vote No! [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
It did not happen, so competition remains strong in California, even with powerful consumer protections in place. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
It did not happen, so competition remains strong in California, even with powerful consumer protections in place. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
Since he was aged 19, in principle AP qualified for leave to remain under rule 276ADE(1)(v) and it was thus possible to dispose of the appeal by agreement failing which it fell to be considered in accordance with the law stated in the court’s judgment without passing an order. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
So failing to pay the fee renders an application invalid from the outset but the analysis regarding the provision of biometrics was markedly different. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
The system is so cruel that some detainees resort to taking their own lives. [read post]
