Search for: "Connecticut" Results 9141 - 9160 of 28,833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2016, 11:22 am
" Today's ruling of the Supreme Court of Connecticut consists of the opinion of the court and a concurring opinion. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 11:09 am
Goodwin-Gill (Univ. of Oxford), The Syrian Refugee Crisis and International LawMay 26, 2016: Mark Janis (Univ. of Connecticut), Religion and American International Law [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:08 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 52553 (D CT, April 20, 2016), a Connecticut federal district court permitted an inmate to move ahead with his complaint that inmates in segregation were denied religious services.In Cejas v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 8:05 am by Consuella Pachico
Judge Barbara Bellis, of the Fairfield District Superior Court in Connecticut, ruled that the case can proceed to theThe post Trial Date Set For Lawsuit Filed By Families Of Sandy Hook Victims appeared first on Legal Reader. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 10:40 am by Paul Caron
Benjamin Alarie (Toronto), The Path of the Law: Toward Legal Singularity Kathleen Bakarich & Jon Kerr (CUNY), Compliance Costs and Book-Tax Conformity: Evidence from Audit Fees and Audit Quality Steven Bank (UCLA), Major League Soccer as a Case Study in Complexity Theory Bethany Berger (Connecticut), The Illusion of Fiscal Illusion... [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 8:36 am
A Connecticut jury has awarded $1.8 million to a 28 year-old woman whose surgeon inadvertently cut one of her fallopian tubes, rendering her sterile. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 6:11 am by Jared Staver
In Arizona, Connecticut and Maine, drivers who are observed driving with pets in their laps can be charged with distracted driving. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 3:36 am by Andrew G. Slutkin
A Connecticut jury has awarded $1.8 million to a 28 year-old woman whose surgeon inadvertently cut one of her fallopian tubes, rendering her sterile. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:48 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
States which allow marijuana for medical use include Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington – as well as the District of Columbia. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:00 am by vhunt
University of Connecticut School of LawRick Pildes, New York University School of Law, presents today as part of the Faculty Workshop Series: Institutions and Constitutional Theory. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:35 am by Liisa Speaker
However, the record was unclear as to when the father actually moved to Connecticut. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am by Harold O'Grady
Connecticut); that states are bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court and cannot ignore them (Cooper v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:02 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The four named plaintiffs brought suit under the FLSA and the laws of New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut, claiming that they and the purported class members were entitled to overtime pay and business expenses, and proposing three classes and an opt-in federal collective. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:26 am by Patricia Salkin
The Supreme Court of Connecticut granted the petition of defendant, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Lisbon, for certification for appeal on the limited questions of whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court correctly determined that Brenmor Properties, LLC’s noncompliance with a road ordinance did not constitute a valid ground on which to deny its modified affordable housing application; and whether the Appellate Court correctly determined… [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:43 am by Walter Olson
“Sixty-eight-year-old Geoffrey Akers, highly accomplished both academically and professionally, has sued the University of Connecticut Law School over the school’s denying him twice into its 2012 and 2013 classes. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court for the District of Connecticut denied the employer’s motion to dismiss on the grounds that the EEOC’s allegations were sufficient to state plausible claims for retaliation and interference under Sections 503(a) and 503(b) of the ADA. [read post]