Search for: "Does, 1-25" Results 9141 - 9160 of 18,534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2016, 5:22 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The sections are adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the August 11, 2000 issue of the Texas Register (25 TexReg 7465). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:05 am
While laudable, this entry point clouds an assessment of where the legal system is moving because it neglects the fundamental role of the political power organizing it: the CCP.The legal system does not operate in a vacuum. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:22 am by Michael Geist
EFF argues that the change has enormous implications: What does this surreptitious change from “paragraph” to “subparagraph” mean? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
Since religious freedom under Article 25 is subject to ‘other provisions of [Part III on fundamental rights]’, how do we understand the exclusionary rule in the light of the fundamental right against sex discrimination under Article 15(1)? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The agency does not release the names of the problem institutions.) [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:14 am by Dave Maass
But before the license plate readers could even be installed, the Kyle city council voted 6-1 to rescind the order. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 8:49 am
The OMHA Medicare Appellant Forum will take place on February 25, 2016, at 1:00pm-4:00pm EST. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:42 am by GSU Law Student
Super Tuesday does not come without issues, however. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:42 am by GSU Law Student
Super Tuesday does not come without issues, however. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:18 am
Posted by David Smith, University of Virginia, on Thursday, February 25, 2016 Editor's Note: David Smith is Professor of Commerce at the University of Virginia. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Unlike the limitations and exceptions provisions, this is not a limitation or exception as it does not envision the possibility of permitting a user to circumvent a digital lock. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:45 am by INFORRM
The two principle YouTube videos in question were both blocked by Google after they had been posted online, but with different degrees of expedition: The first video (URL1) was posted to a YouTube account on 25 August 2014 and flagged the next day for review using the reporting tool on the YouTube website. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:46 am by Daniel Shaviro
  I agree to a significant extent, but (unsurprisingly, given our respective track records) view the issues differently in some respects.1) What important principles does OECD-BEPS endorse, and might it instead have endorsed? [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am by Howard Knopf
Based upon what I heard on January 22, 2016, it does not appear that the Board was noticeably much more “inquisitorial” than usual. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 7:26 am by Mark Hartsoe
A defense expert testified that the step does not “have an obvious visual cue provided. [read post]