Search for: "In re Richard A" Results 9141 - 9160 of 10,344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2007, 12:54 am
Yes, They Charge More: They're Experts The Recorder Last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that a select group of New York lawyers had pushed hourly billing rates past the $1,000 mark. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The fieldfisher Privacy, Security and Information Law blog has a post entitled “Re-Consenting to marketing under GDPR? [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 11:06 pm
[For more on the Detroit bankruptcy vs. bailout, see this exchange between Gary Becker and Richard Posner. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Victoria and Richard MacKenzie-Childs (Property, Intangible) TTAB finds service mark application void ab initio for non-use because services were not rendered prior to filing: Parametric Technology Corporation v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
At a conference call with their lawyers on September 17, 2014, Kay stated his willingness to discuss potential “amendments” to the August 28 agreements but was unwilling to rescind and re-execute them. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:06 pm by Ken White
You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:21 am by Susan Brenner
John Menzel, to the Sheriff's office to interview him regarding an alleged sexual battery which occurred at Menzel's home and involved the alleged victim, Menzel, and [Richard] Hentz. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 9:38 am
"They're a bit of an investment," he said. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am by Frank Cranmer
Consistory courts – a cautionary note In Re St Gregory Sudbury [2022] ECC SEI 2, Gau Ch commenced his judgment with advice to the Petitioners which is likely to be of general applicability: “[1]. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am by Orin Kerr
Over a decade later, the North Dakota Supreme Court and Wisconsin Supreme Court recognized good faith exceptions for changing law in light of Richards v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:55 am by Jim Sedor
That decision led to much public criticism and prompted leaders from both parties to call on the commission to re-hear the case. [read post]