Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 88,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Additionally, in Phillip v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm
The UCCJEA was recently at the forefront in Dalessio v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:36 pm
Judge Areces takes the first hit in our 3rd DCA roundup in State v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:42 am
"Plaintiff stated a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487 by alleging that defendant deceived or attempted to deceive the court with a fictitious letter addressed to him from the former licensing director of the City's Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) that stated, inter alia, that plaintiff was under a lifetime ban on owning any licenses with the TLC (see Amalfitano v Rosenberg, 12 NY3d 8, 14 [2009]). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:58 pm
State v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
Since January 2017, over two dozen judges have heard oral arguments concerning the legality of President Trump’s travel bans. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:15 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:01 pm
The ICA's summary disposition order is here.Here are the cert application and the State's opposition, and two amicus briefs supporting the applicant: Application for writ of certiorari State of Hawaii's Opposition Amicus brief of Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation Amicus brief of Hawaii's Thousand Friends The case relied upon by the ICA, Pono v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 12:27 pm
The latest foray by federal courts into the anachronistic (and often bizarre) legal analysis of who qualifies as an “Indian” comes from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in its decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 7:22 am
The first, Home Depot v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:11 am
AG Capital Funding Partners, LP v State Street Bank and Trust Co, 11 NY3d 146, 866 NYS2d 578, 896 NE2d 91 (2008). [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 8:26 am
Cindy V. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 10:52 am
The State of Georgia waived its right to file a response brief. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:24 pm
The latter was the older rule in a case from the early 1980s, People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:53 pm
See also Connell v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:27 pm
If the writers wish their comments to be given serious consideration, they are invited to amend their posts so as to state who they are. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
Lowe, Princeton University A Slave’s Only Legal Right: Freedom Suits in the American StatesPeter Wallenstein, Virginia Polytechnic Institute The Indians’ Constitution: Uncovering the Native History of the FramingGregory Ablavsky, University of Pennsylvania COMMENT: Alfred Brophy, University of North Carolina,Chapel Hill (As you can see, I'm hoping a few of you can tough it out until Sunday morning, so there are at least as many people in… [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:06 am
, The Alcohol Beverage Legal Environment Post-Granholm (exploring the legal environment, post-Granholm, relative to the constitutionality of the several state liquor regulatory laws); see also Southern Wine & Spirits, et al. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
As Lord Carnwath concluded after his illuminating discussion of the standard required of planning reasons (at paras 35-42), the question will be “whether the information so provided by the authority leaves room for ‘genuine doubt … as to what (it) has decided and why’” (at para 42, citing Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Clarke Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 66 P & CR 263). [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 7:25 am
The plaintiff must demonstrate the absence of an adequate legal remedy, and plaintiff cannot do that here. [read post]
