Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 9141 - 9160 of 21,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  The district court will rule later on the amount of monetary damages for which the defendants are liable. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 11:25 am by Nathan Meyer
The Rationale First: under Arizona common law, an indemnity plaintiff must show: it discharged a legal obligation owed to a third party, for which the indemnity defendant was also liable, and the obligation should have been discharged by the indemnity defendant. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:57 am by Bradley Coxe
When his injuries are aggravated or activated by a pre-existing physical or mental condition, defendant is liable to the extent that his wrongful act proximately and naturally aggravated or activated plaintiff's condition. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:57 am by Bradley Coxe
When his injuries are aggravated or activated by a pre-existing physical or mental condition, defendant is liable to the extent that his wrongful act proximately and naturally aggravated or activated plaintiff's condition. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 12:45 pm by Eric Beasley
Further, in response to the defendants motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff produced an affidavit from his passenger, stating he saw the defendants name on the door of the tractor during the accident. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:57 am by Bradley Coxe
When his injuries are aggravated or activated by a pre-existing physical or mental condition, defendant is liable to the extent that his wrongful act proximately and naturally aggravated or activated plaintiff's condition. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by Robert Kraft
Bob Billings said “the court recognized generic makers were “in the impossible position of defending the content of a label that they are required by law to use but prevented by law from changing. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:17 am by Bob Kraft
Bob Billings said "the court recognized generic makers were "in the impossible position of defending the content of a label that they are required by law to use but prevented by law from changing. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:51 pm by Eric Goldman
Facebook * Fourth Judge Says Social Media Sites Aren’t Liable for Supporting Terrorists–Pennie v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm by Madelaine Lane
  At trial, the defendant argued that the pastor and the church could not be held liable for these statements because the pastor was protected by the qualified privilege. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:17 am by Aaron Lindstrom
Darr, the Court vacated the Court of Appeals’ order denying leave to appeal, reversed the circuit court’s order that denied the defendants appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw (based on an undisclosed conflict of interest), and remanded for the appointment of new appellate counsel. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:54 am by Stephen M. Ozcomert
” Under this concept, the employer may be liable if the employee’s negligent conduct occurred while acting within the scope of his or her employment. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:15 am
  I even have some doubt about whether the defendants are in fact corporations, as I could not find either using the California Secretary of State's online business search. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
However, if the defendant is found liable, they will be required to reimburse the claimant an amount equal to the bond. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
There is no evidence that defendants knew and intended that their advice to plaintiff's late husband was aimed at affecting plaintiff's conduct or was made to induce her to act. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 10:53 pm
Velma Avalos, Diamond's mother, is named along with Diamond's estate as the plaintiff in the case. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 8:30 am
The practical effect of this provision will be to protect defendants who may very well be liable because the injured plaintiff will be unable to pursue discovery to prove the legitimacy of their claims. [read post]
30 May 2014, 2:28 pm by Page Pate
Johnson, Jackson, and Teemer were each held to be 5 percent liable, with 85 percent of the award to be paid by the Motel 6 chain and Accor North America Inc., the chain’s parent company. [read post]