Search for: "Little v State"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 23,804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2021, 8:00 am
Anita Martin for Marlene Hill v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 3:26 am
" (Now there's a mental image for you; a little like the image at issue in Deere v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:38 pm
Western States Medical Center v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
A little over a decade ago, Justice Scalia delivered the judgment of the Court—writing for himself and three other justices in Vieth v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:45 am
People v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:09 pm
In March, in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:17 am
The recent decision of Seiden v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 2:42 pm
Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:30 am
But something seemed a little off in the facts. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 12:29 pm
ShareThe issue in Dewberry Group v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:50 am
In Gridiron Management Group LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 9:04 am
Employment law experts have been paying close attention to how federal courts are interpreting the 2009 Supreme Court case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:30 am
At the risk of being untoward, but last month's Godwin v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 10:30 am
The Appeals Court recently issued a decision – Thompson v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 4:58 am
In Apache Deepwater, LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 5:25 am
The Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee last week held a hearing on the Medical Device Safety Act of 2009 (S. 540), which if enacted would overturn the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Medical Device Amendments (MDA) to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in Reigel v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
Lubinski v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:38 am
Co-author Carolina Cuppitelli* The question presented in Aaron v. [read post]
