Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9141 - 9160
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2013, 7:08 am
On the other are the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Patrick Leahy, and former House Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner—along with Senators like Ron Wyden, Richard Blumenthal, Mark Udall, Al Franken, Rand Paul and Mike Lee and a motley crew of House members too. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 6:40 am
If you don’t know MILO, you should. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:50 am
” Id. at 6 (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
So we permit uncorroborated claims to serve as the bench mark for juries to use in deciding whether a complainant is, in fact, a victim. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:11 pm
It is fairly easy to make a complaint (you don’t need to be a consumer to do so). [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:30 am
And who doesn’t enjoy candid? [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 7:44 am
It doesn’t matter if the prevailing version sounds like Archie Bunker’s story or his son-in-law’s. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
That’s the sum total of the discussion of preemption in Carter – the defendant was right, and the plaintiff wrong, about the process that was at issue, but without unspecified “clear authority,” the opinion simply refuses to recognize preemption, no matter how close the analogy, and without explaining why.Even though the defendant did not prevail on preemption in Carter – very unconvincingly – the opinion was interesting because it turned us onto a… [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
However, that is not the end of the matter. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
We don’t sell anything with her name. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:01 pm
And high numbers saying they’d vote for Walker, no matter who the opponent is. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
One has only to look at the Bradlaugh-Besant litigation in the 1870s to see a society which in such matters was almost unimaginably different from ours. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:13 am
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:14 pm
To make matter worse, Pintrips is, somewhat, shooting itself in the foot by arguing genericness. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 10:12 am
” The Economist isn’t convinced all are as mad as they claim to be—no ultimatums have been made of the U.S., and anyway we are not the only one bugging countries overseas. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:16 am
Unfortunate, because this permission is frequently abused, especially by less experienced trademark counsel, or perhaps when the strength of a case doesn’t seem like enough without injecting an unhealthy dose of emotion into the matter. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:01 am
The other panel members are attorneys Tom Killeen (Farrell Fritz) and Russell Stern (Silverman Acampora) and business appraiser Mark Warshavsky (Gettry Marcus). [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Most distressing of course it means that crucial human rights issues don’t get addressed. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 7:51 am
Of all the criminal matters I defend, I am most frequently asked questions about DUI laws more than any other offense. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 11:19 am
Mark Martins, proposes beginning with a motion to compel, AE167, before moving on to, among other things, argument on AE120. [read post]
