Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 55,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2017, 12:26 pm
This was a misfortune for those turned away, but excluding aliens for reasons Congress believes sufficient to serve the public welfare is a nigh-unquestioned power of a sovereign nation. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
., v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am
As such, it would fall under a separate set of provisions and related expedited procedures under the War Powers Resolution—provisions widely believed to be unconstitutional following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:07 pm
The Fifth Circuit’s recent decision invalidating tenure protections for SEC Administrative Law Judges (“ALJs”) in Jarkesy v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 2:54 pm
Notably, R v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:56 pm
Fear for a person’s future livelihood can be a powerful gag. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:00 am
In Discovery Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:54 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio itself exercised this power in Dardinger v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:14 am
“The only anticompetitive conduct that Freedom Watch alleges (without supporting factual allegations) is that the Platforms conspired against it to suppress conservative content, but not that the Platforms conspired to acquire or maintain monopoly power. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
In Ayala v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:29 pm
See Henderson v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:55 pm
In Virginia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:22 pm
Patent attorney Jill Browning attended today’s Tafas v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:12 am
Control Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[5] In Bush v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[5] In Bush v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 4:22 am
Black & Decker, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 11:38 am
While this power is infrequently exercised, it should not be forgotten. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
Here, stare decisis can no longer support the Court’s prohibition of a valid exercise of the States’ sovereign power. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:30 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
