Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 9141 - 9160 of 41,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2010, 4:11 am
Attempting to vacate a consent agreement resolving an administrative proceedingMatter of Kirk v State Bd. for Professional Med. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 3:59 pm
"Finally, at page 55 of his judgment, Judge Davis had held that none of the three factors in Soverain Software LLC v Amazon.com, Inc. pointed to a stay of proceedings pending reexamination by the USTPO of i4i's patent. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm by Derek T. Muller
States have the power to determine the qualifications of voters; there’s a plausible argument that includes the power to enforce qualifications, as the Supreme Court suggested in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am by Amy Howe
In the second case this morning, Elonis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 5:57 am by John Jascob
Additionally, the petitioners are asking the high court to overturn lifetime industry bans, arguing that such injunctions constitute penalties which are unconstitutional in violation of separation-of-powers principles (Southern Trust Metals, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:11 am by Rosalind English
More secret justice on the horizon Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play More secret trials? [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:49 pm
 A few months later, EPA issued the PSD permit authorizing Deseret to build the waste-coal-fired generating unit and stating that Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:00 am by Kenneth Anderson
” The FAA issued an “Administrator’s Order of Assessment” (Administrator v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:17 pm by Deeptak Gupta
It gave companies even more power when it also ruled out class-based arbitrations. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 2:11 pm by Ilya Somin
 Some 20 states did enact meaningful reforms, and several state supreme courts strengthened judicial scrutiny of public use. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:59 pm
Goldsmith, 526 U.S. 529, 534 (1999) (though Appellate Government erroneously cited that decision as United States v. [read post]