Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 9141 - 9160 of 13,837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm by Kara M. Maciel
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:38 am by Zachary C. Jackson
On Friday, Google asked the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to dismiss another lawsuit (Santiago v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:38 am by Zachary C. Jackson
On Friday, Google asked the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to dismiss another lawsuit (Santiago v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Ken
Take it away, Martinez v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 2:12 am by admin
Attorney for the Central District of California May 25 withdrew the government’s appeal of a trial court decision tossing out the bribery convictions of Lindsey Manufacturing Co. and its senior executives based on prosecutorial misconduct (United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:23 pm by Stephen Page
  Commercial surrogacy is available in India, Thailand, and parts of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:01 am by Thomas Kaufman
 It is possible that the California Supreme Court will feel greater need as a result of this decision to address the viability of Gentry when it eventually issues a decision in the Sonic-Calabasas case that the United States Supreme Court reversed last year (opinion expected no sooner than 2013). [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:17 pm
Since the first state legislations targeted at protecting mostly women and children from wage exploitation, the minimum wage has expanded its protections today to cover almost all workers in the United States through passage in 1938 of the Fair Labor Standards Act and subsequent amendments. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm by Jay Eng
In the decision, the court found that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:03 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
But we believe that United States Supreme Court has spoken on the issue, and we are required to follow its binding authority. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:39 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
PDT *** RSVP to melissa@afer.org for access code San Francisco, CA – Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a request from anti-marriage forces to reconsider its landmark ruling in Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:39 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
PDT *** RSVP to melissa@afer.org for access code San Francisco, CA – Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a request from anti-marriage forces to reconsider its landmark ruling in Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
  The dissenting opinion, from O'Scannlain, Bybee, and Bea said: A few weeks ago, subsequent to oral argument in this case, the President of the United States ignited a media firestorm by announcing that he supports same-sex marriage as a policy matter. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  But we believe that United States Supreme Court has spoken on the issue, and we are required to follow its binding authority. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]