Search for: "State v House"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 28,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court held in Mistretta v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:32 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 5:30 am
Related StoriesIn re: Sssotlohiefmjn v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
He noted that s.118, was as follows: (1) A secure tenant has the right to buy, that is to say, in the circumstances and subject to the conditions and exceptions stated in the following provisions of this Part - … (b) if the landlord does not own the freehold, or if the dwelling-house is a flat (whether or not the landlord owns the freehold), to be granted a lease of the dwelling-house. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
He noted that s.118, was as follows: (1) A secure tenant has the right to buy, that is to say, in the circumstances and subject to the conditions and exceptions stated in the following provisions of this Part - … (b) if the landlord does not own the freehold, or if the dwelling-house is a flat (whether or not the landlord owns the freehold), to be granted a lease of the dwelling-house. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
In its 1968 decision in Zschernig v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am
In Gibbons v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
The Act adopts and incorporates an affirmative defense to hostile work environment claims that was recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Faragher v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
The Act adopts and incorporates an affirmative defense to hostile work environment claims that was recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Faragher v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
A notice of Saul Cornell’s research in advance of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:55 pm
Div. 2006) (stating “a parent cannot bargain away a child’s right to support because the right to support belongs to the child, not the parent”); Patetta v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:21 am
In Rivas v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:25 pm
In Taumoepeau v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
The case is Chanel Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:53 pm
And then we have Broomleigh Housing Association Ltd v Okonkwo [2010] EWCA Civ 1113 Mr O was Broomleigh's tenant. [read post]
