Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 40,863
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
It is neither stated nor implied in the text. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 2:10 pm
Although the seminal DUI case of Birchfield v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:43 am
On Wednesday 13 November 2019, the Court will hand down judgment in RR (AP) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
Pieces of the Amount A Puzzle Profit Margin Z Deemed Routine Profits X Deemed Non-Routine Profits Y=Z-X and Y=W+V Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Markets W Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Other Factors V To achieve tax certainty and minimize negative economic consequences, it will be important for businesses to have clearly defined metrics that determine the “sustained and significant involvement” for a market jurisdiction to have taxing… [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am
This judgment seems fallacious in relying on Walden v Fiore as this judgment doesn’t cover situations where the defendant has minimum contacts with the United States and any of the states within itself. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:57 am
US (Guest Blog Post) * Indianapolis Police Have Been “Blinded Lately Because They Shut Backpage Down” * Constitutional Challenge Against FOSTA Filed–Woodhull v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
” (Shutting down medical marijuana was proper, but directing sheriffs to do background checks was not.) [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Particularity At the outset of the Avery discussion, I remind students that the Fourth Amendment’s plain language, as well as Supreme Court precedent, make clear that a search warrant must state with particularity the place to be searched and the things to be seized. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
The answer is 'yes', according to the ruling passed down at the beginning of November by His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) in Bentley 1962 Limited and Brandlogic Limited v Bentley Motors Limited [2019] EWHC 2925 (Ch). [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:16 pm
§48 in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:16 pm
§48 in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
On 5 November 2019 Steyn J handed down judgment in the case of Hemming v Baker [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB). [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 10:18 am
Leung v Town of Oyster Bay, 2019 WL 5309995 (EDNY 10/21/2019) [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 7:58 am
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit agreed to rehear a lawsuit filed by a non-Native American couple in Texas claiming the ICWA discriminates on the basis of race and infringes on states’ rights. *** Kathryn Fort, a Michigan State law professor and one of the nation’s foremost ICWA experts, told The Washington Post she thinks there are more important battles to wage on behalf of children. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:55 pm
Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited (Case C-18/18) The finding of the CJEU in the Google v CNIL case bears some notable differences to the more recent judgment of the same court in Glawischnig v FB, which was handed down on 3 October 2019, little over a week after the Google case. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 11:33 am
United States (Jan. 14) Romag Fasteners v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 10:12 am
William V. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:23 am
The second prong of Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
