Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 13,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state-owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
First, states’ rights. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 12:24 am
By Nicole KilloranLathrop et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:45 pm
It also has echoes in the attempts of some in state legislatures to criminalize dissent in new and creative ways. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
We cannot remain silent under these extraordinary circumstances about a lifetime appointment to the highest court of the land. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
We cannot remain silent under these extraordinary circumstances about a lifetime appointment to the highest court of the land. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:03 am
In Starker v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 7:47 am
The court relied on West Lakes Properties, L.C. v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 8:31 am
P. 6.904(3)(k); see also Kufer v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:31 pm
(Citizens For Ceres v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:33 am
- United States Constitution, Amendment 4 There is great consensus that the 1765 case of Entick v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Earle, 38 U.S. 519 (1839) and Paul v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 12:52 pm
Beyond that, we have what I described elsewhere as an ‘epidemic of Brady violations abroad in the land,’ a phrase that has brought much controversy but brought about little change in the way prosecutors operate in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:21 am
For example, the Act extended the reach of the federal regulatory power beyond federal lands to private and state areas. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:55 am
BCD, LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 10:29 am
The court followed the much-criticized decision in Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
