Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2015, 2:10 am
In George v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
In 2003, California lawmakers enacted Labor Code Section 1102.6, setting forth a framework for whistleblower retaliation claims that varied from the burden-shifting test established by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:03 am
The judge stated that if the contribution included something else (e.g. new physical combination of hardware), it may be entitled to protection. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:15 pm
Jordan testified, U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:55 pm
” The defendants argued that they should not be liable for “exceeding authorized access” in light of the recent Ninth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:44 am
Earlier this week, in Lowry v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 6:07 am
Spicer v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:44 am
In Araiza v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:46 pm
V. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
G.S. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
§ 240.10b-5.In doing so, the Second Circuit addressed the gap left by the United States Supreme Court in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:54 am
The case is Delgado-Ramos v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:27 am
Defendant’s Response to United States’ Opposition to Motion to Suppress Evidence, U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:04 am
Pursuant to that statute, "[a] sworn juror must be discharged when facts come to light, which were not known at the time the jury was empaneled, indicating that the juror is 'grossly unqualified to serve'" (People v Harris, 99 NY2d 202, 212 [2002], quoting CPL 270.35 [1]). [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
” Peak v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
The motivation behind the proposed rules stems from the 2018 Supreme Court decision in SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 10:00 pm
On December 29, 2014 we reported on an opinion handed down by the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals in Flexicrew Staffing, Inc. v Champion. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 2:52 pm
In a recent opinion, Hardeman County v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:29 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The alleged altering and commercial exploitation of a nine-year-old photo of a then-teen with Down Syndrome that went viral on the Internet prompted the 26-year-old man and his parents last week to file an $18 million suit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, according to reports by the Associated Press and the NashvilleCityPaper.com Web site.Holland et al. v. [read post]
