Search for: "State v. Weeks" Results 9141 - 9160 of 42,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
This year’s IP Inclusive Week is from 11th -17th November 2019. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:02 pm by Immigration Prof
Last week, the Trump administration filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to hear United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 2:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
On October 24, 2019, the Federal Court of Australia issued a post-trial Order in the TPT Patrol Pty Ltd as trustee for Amies Superannuation Fund v Myer Holdings Limited. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Lisa Stam and Sherifa Hadi
We have spoken about whether an employee can take back their intention to retire in a previous blog post regarding the Ontario Superior Court decision in English v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Two noteworthy changes this week. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:20 am by Joel Goldstein
Having decided two maritime-law cases during its October 2018 term, the Supreme Court will consider its third admiralty case in just over a year when it hears argument in CITGO Asphalt Refining Company v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
The appeals court said in a ruling last week: "Whether the MMA applies to and pre-empts Flo & Eddie's claims, as Flo & Eddie note, cannot be answered on the record before us. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg  Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Just one week before, however, we had discussed Rescuecom v Google (...), a case where the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit come to the opposite conclusion on the exact same facts. [read post]