Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm
In the decision, the court found that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:03 pm
But we believe that United States Supreme Court has spoken on the issue, and we are required to follow its binding authority. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
PDT *** RSVP to melissa@afer.org for access code San Francisco, CA – Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a request from anti-marriage forces to reconsider its landmark ruling in Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
PDT *** RSVP to melissa@afer.org for access code San Francisco, CA – Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a request from anti-marriage forces to reconsider its landmark ruling in Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
The dissenting opinion, from O'Scannlain, Bybee, and Bea said: A few weeks ago, subsequent to oral argument in this case, the President of the United States ignited a media firestorm by announcing that he supports same-sex marriage as a policy matter. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
But we believe that United States Supreme Court has spoken on the issue, and we are required to follow its binding authority. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:54 pm
But we believe that United States Supreme Court has spoken on the issue, and we are required to follow its binding authority. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:54 pm
– New Jersey lawyer James McDonough Jr. of Scarinci Hollenbeck on the firm’s blog, Tax, Trust and Estate News Regulations and Something Else 2: NLRB’s Murky “Social Media” Memo – Washington, DC lawyer Lee Beck on his blog, the Federal Regulations Advisor California Goes Nontoxic: The state passes an unprecedented green initiative – The blogging lawyers and attorneys at Morrison Foerster on their blog, MoFo Tech Surprise, Surprise, the EPA… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
Largent Today a California court issued the first published state court decision addressing whether the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v Concepcion invalidates the California Supreme Court's decision in Gentry v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:53 am
(Photo credit: ElectronicFrontierFoundation)The Electronic Frontier Foundation ("EFF"), a nonprofit online free speech advocate, wants a California federal court to retain a defamation suit into which a federal judge in Illinois has inserted himself, the Courthouse News Service reports.The United States District Court for the Central District of California is where plaintiffs last month initially filed an 18-page Complaint alleging, among other counts,… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
The Second Circuit said that “rather than looking to the identity of the parties, the type of security at issue, or whether each individual defendant engaged in conduct within the United States, we hold that a securities transaction is domestic when the parties incur irrevocable liability to carry out the transaction within the United States or when title is passed with the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 3:05 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:00 pm
DOJ today filed this reply brief on behalf of NCIS Special Agent Gerald Martin in his 9th Circuit appeal challenging the United States District Court for the Southern District of California’s ruling rejecting his argument that Carolyn Martin’s suit againt him must be dismissed on qualified immunity grounds. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
In The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Julia Angwin and Jess Bravin report on arguments made by the government in a GPS tracking case in the Ninth Circuit in light of the Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
