Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 60,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2018, 2:58 pm
The case is entitled American Oversight v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Thus, in Lawson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:42 pm
Absent any further appeal or development, this means that California is permitted to continue work on its cap and trade program while the appellate court hears the full merits of the State’s appeal of a lower court’s decision that the State violated its environmental assessment law, CEQA, in developing its program for reducing greenhouse gas emissions under AB 32. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:15 am
HHJ Mitchell quashed that decision, finding that Reg 6(2) operates when a person is no longer working, ie if the illness happens after the applicant lost his job and even if the illness was unrelated to his work; and that he was bound by the decision in FB v Secretary of State for Work [2010] UKUT 447 (IAC) to find that temporary in para (a) meant not permanent. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:15 am
HHJ Mitchell quashed that decision, finding that Reg 6(2) operates when a person is no longer working, ie if the illness happens after the applicant lost his job and even if the illness was unrelated to his work; and that he was bound by the decision in FB v Secretary of State for Work [2010] UKUT 447 (IAC) to find that temporary in para (a) meant not permanent. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 12:00 pm
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on Tuesday in Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:45 pm
The new law addresses to some extent California's Second District Appellate Court's decision in The Fifth Day, LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 5:58 am
The Opinion Letter referenced the Supreme Court decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:18 am
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:01 am
The car backed into a parking space and then remained in that spot for several hours.That same morning, Thrailkill walked out of his house to go to work between 6:30 and 6:45 a.m. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:31 pm
McCain v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:14 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
The honored works will be republished in the forthcoming Green Bag Almanac & Reader 2007. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 5:11 pm
Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 6:06 pm
The Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:37 pm
Henderson appealed his dismissal to the Nebraska Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:09 pm
AEP yesterday: [Lawyer for the state plaintiffs Barbara] Underwood, pressed to cite past court cases that might show this particular lawsuit could work in court, had no close parallels to rely upon. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
This is the kind of work that ought to make national news & promote law reform. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:00 pm
Specifically, in Prigge v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
