Search for: "DOE 5" Results 9161 - 9180 of 82,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2016, 4:03 am by Ben
”Having said so, the Court turned to consideration of the French law, and noted how that legislation does not appear to offer a mechanism ensuring that authors are actually and individually informed. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 9:14 pm by Orin Kerr
How long after a decision is handed down does law become "clearly established"? [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:35 am
”Having said so, the Court turned to consideration of the French law, and noted how that legislation does not appear to offer a mechanism ensuring that authors are actually and individually informed. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:27 pm by Harley Geiger
” Although ONC’s standard-setting and coordinating functions are crucial, ONC does not have sufficient authority or enforcement tools from Congress to address all of the issues identified by the OIG. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:55 pm by Jack Wenik
While fake negative reviews about a competitor are not “endorsements,” they may still be deceptive and therefore in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:54 am by Derek T. Muller
” (p. 17)Unfortunately, the Court’s interpretation of precedent does not rely as heavily on the text of the Constitution, which states that the electors “shall make distinct lists . . . which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:58 pm
Campbell, the court found the $5 million punitive damages award was tainted by improperly admitted evidence. [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
IPilogue  5. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:09 am
  The Court divided 5-4 in Haywood v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 2:11 pm by Meg Kribble
If the former, I'm in favor of it, but hope the statement will be revised for clarity.If the latter, the statement does not reflect reality. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 10:51 pm
    Does this signal that she has doubts about the merits of petitioner's case, or merely that she has objections to the issue being presented in this forum in this manner? [read post]