Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9161 - 9180
of 9,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2023, 6:40 am
Fund v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
Low-Profile Supreme Court Case Offers Glimpse of Sharp Divide
Legal Times
The case of Bowles v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
However, English law does not allow litigants to bring claims in multiple fora. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 12:34 pm
A firm’s Form CRS should be written in plain English; indeed, firms are instructed to avoid using legal jargon and highly technical terms. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:06 am
” UPDATED 1:08pm: In Plain English: Under federal law, state prisoners can go to federal court to challenge the constitutionality of their convictions – a process known as “federal habeas. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
—Danielle Steel 1Franatovich v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
Rule 14a-8(i)(7) Ordinary Business Operations The first, Rule 14a-8(i)(7), comes in the context of the recent Delaware District Court decision in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:42 am
Nevertheless, following an English statute of 1701 relating to state oaths (The Security of Succession, etc. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
Employee Becomes Mother’s Primary Caregiver The facts that gave rise to the complaint of discrimination in Cosentino v Octapharma Canada Inc. arose in early 2020, during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm
Like Jonathan’s work, this chapter provides readers of English language scholarship with a rare example of in-depth analysis of concepts which are unfamiliar in the Anglo-American tradition. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
Cardozo in the case of Wood v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm
The English kingdom is restored, but it's France that restores it. [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:15 pm
The absence of a serial comma in a series carried little weight where, as here, the interpretation that was advanced otherwise conflicted with well-recognized rules of grammar and with standard English usage. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
The Examiner then cited Stevens v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 2:34 am
A measure of the importance that the SPCIPC attaches to its cases in that the following paragraph was the first substantive section of its 2019 annual report [scroll to the bottom of the link for English]: Ⅰ. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:39 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
See, People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
Part V addresses Miller and Tucker's claim that the American Founders were unfamiliar with dramatic technological changes in firearms — a claim that is refuted by Dupuy's data. [read post]
