Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9161 - 9180
of 11,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
The doubts about Mr J's evidence even extended to his knowledge of English: Mr. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:42 am
Many people who use such services do not speak English. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:44 am
I have a few thoughts about Chancellor Chandler's opinion in eBay v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:50 am
However, if he were left to his own devices he would be apt to conclude that the characterisation of Lord Bingham as "The greatest English judge of the modern era" -- as The Guardian claims -- was a little over-the-top. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Hart, Jr, (describing Perry v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:59 pm
Obviously, virtue ethics has something to do with virtue, which in this context is closely related in meaning to the English word "excellence," the Latin "virtu," and the Greek, "arete. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 2:24 am
In another similarly named case of the following year, A & Ors v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:14 am
In contrast, under English law the threatened conduct would plainly have been criminal. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:41 pm
In decisions like Olmstead v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” Dowling v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:56 pm
The article concerned a Mr Andrew Johns, an Australian Rugby League player who had expressed a desire to play a game for an English football club, thereby generating a public debate about the propriety of doing so and about his commitment to his own team, the Kangaroos. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:46 pm
See, e.g., Saudi Basic Indust.Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm
The restriction confirmed by the courts in Whaley v Lord Watson 2000 (later confirmed by the House of lords). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:06 am
No-one seems to have worried that this second property was located in Poland and so no-one considered whether Polish or English law should apply for any determination of the size of the defendant's share or whether in fact Polish law on fractional co-ownership (which I understand would be the Polish equivalent of beneficial tenancy in common under a trust for land) would operate the same way as the English principles in Stack v Dowden. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:06 am
No-one seems to have worried that this second property was located in Poland and so no-one considered whether Polish or English law should apply for any determination of the size of the defendant's share or whether in fact Polish law on fractional co-ownership (which I understand would be the Polish equivalent of beneficial tenancy in common under a trust for land) would operate the same way as the English principles in Stack v Dowden. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:19 am
Donath v Trustees of the Second Duke of Westminster Will Trust [PDF] is a first instance decision of the LVT. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:19 am
Donath v Trustees of the Second Duke of Westminster Will Trust [PDF] is a first instance decision of the LVT. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
I suggest that this may be the case because the test for capacity to marry, as stated in Banton v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:30 am
The Respondent in Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. ll, FA1007001336979 (Nat. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:19 am
Mr Green anticipates that “the conventionally minded English lawyer” will protest against his arguments on the basis that companies are undoubtedly “legal persons” but this does not seem to us to be significant. [read post]
