Search for: "In re R. F." Results 9161 - 9180 of 10,009
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2008, 7:23 am
If you're one of the hundreds of attorneys given notice by your employer because of downsizing or so called "performance issue," you may need some help in your quest for a new job. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:51 pm
“I’m not suggesting that officers are doing it,” David F. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Taylor noted that "e preclusive effect of a judgment is defined by claim preclusion and issue preclusion, which are collectively referred to as 'res judicata.'" 128 S. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 3:57 pm
’ Similarly, the District Court decision in In re De Puy, 7 F. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Inventive Step)   US Patent Reform CAFC: PTO control over own proceedings, patent reform: Hyatt v Dudas (Hal Wegner) When considering PTO reform, look to KIPO for clues (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Chamber of Commerce urges IP reform (Patent Baristas) (Patently-O) The message to Barack Obama is clear: the USPTO needs new blood and a strong reform agenda (IAM)   US Patents Patent Prosecution Highway pilot with Canadian Intellectual Property Office is extended (Patent Docs)… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 11:28 pm
The opinion, written by Judge Moore and joined by Judge Newman and District Court Judge Joseph Farnan of the District of Delaware, sitting by designation, reads in its entirety as follows:In light of our decision in In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 4:17 pm
F is for FACIL, a Quebec group that supports open source software. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 9:34 am
They're often more complicated than large commercial litigation or breach of fiduciary duty cases. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:28 am
"I am doing this because I am tired of explaining it to clients, having them nod in agreement, some acting like they are listening to me re-state the obvious, and then at some point, asking for money back.Case in point. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:58 pm
Les preuves doivent permettre une identification non ambiguë par le numéro de la demande.Pour la Chambre, la requête présentée devant le tribunal italien est ambiguë car elle ne se réfère explicitement qu'aux demandes prioritaires US, à… [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:35 pm
  Talk to a lawyer, and they're usually going to say that you should act sooner than later, and often the time limitations are very short. [read post]