Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 9161 - 9180
of 17,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
State, supra (quoting Deal v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm
In Franks v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 9:50 am
After the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
” United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
Down-on-their-luck David & Son, with hungry counsel, v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm
We therefore reverse the judgment of conviction, grant the motion, and dismiss the indictment without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charges under counts two through five of the indictment to another grand jury (see generally People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:38 am
Larry Pitt & Associates v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:17 am
Affirmed.Case Name: LASHAWN SIDNEY KING v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:54 pm
Despite my general approval of certifying state law questions, as I said a while back, I'd have elected to decline to answer this question certified by the Ninth Circuit.But one needs no reminder to recall that my vote counts for absolutely nothing. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:03 pm
Claims that go past that limit probably count, too. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:29 am
Evil": Miguel Angel Cotto v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:33 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 12:05 am
Instead, on appeal the DC Circuit takes precedent seriously and tries to square the NSA surveillance program with United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:32 am
Reversed and remanded in part.Case Name: JAIME SOLIS v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:56 am
Bar Assn. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:20 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:58 am
Right answer says the 11th Cir, it’s the decedent’s home state that counts, not the PR’s — back to state court you go! [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
(Part-time employees are not counted in this calculatio [read post]
