Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 9161 - 9180
of 13,837
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 6:54 pm
But we believe that United States Supreme Court has spoken on the issue, and we are required to follow its binding authority. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:54 pm
– New Jersey lawyer James McDonough Jr. of Scarinci Hollenbeck on the firm’s blog, Tax, Trust and Estate News Regulations and Something Else 2: NLRB’s Murky “Social Media” Memo – Washington, DC lawyer Lee Beck on his blog, the Federal Regulations Advisor California Goes Nontoxic: The state passes an unprecedented green initiative – The blogging lawyers and attorneys at Morrison Foerster on their blog, MoFo Tech Surprise, Surprise, the EPA… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
Largent Today a California court issued the first published state court decision addressing whether the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v Concepcion invalidates the California Supreme Court's decision in Gentry v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:53 am
(Photo credit: ElectronicFrontierFoundation)The Electronic Frontier Foundation ("EFF"), a nonprofit online free speech advocate, wants a California federal court to retain a defamation suit into which a federal judge in Illinois has inserted himself, the Courthouse News Service reports.The United States District Court for the Central District of California is where plaintiffs last month initially filed an 18-page Complaint alleging, among other counts,… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
The Second Circuit said that “rather than looking to the identity of the parties, the type of security at issue, or whether each individual defendant engaged in conduct within the United States, we hold that a securities transaction is domestic when the parties incur irrevocable liability to carry out the transaction within the United States or when title is passed with the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 3:05 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:00 pm
DOJ today filed this reply brief on behalf of NCIS Special Agent Gerald Martin in his 9th Circuit appeal challenging the United States District Court for the Southern District of California’s ruling rejecting his argument that Carolyn Martin’s suit againt him must be dismissed on qualified immunity grounds. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
In The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Julia Angwin and Jess Bravin report on arguments made by the government in a GPS tracking case in the Ninth Circuit in light of the Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:35 am
Employers should, however, stay informed about this area of law because there appears to be a shift, not only in California, but also across the United States, in the public’s perception of recreational and medical use of marijuana. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:46 am
National Protest on DOMA—Michael Lehet (Flickr.com) When some constitutionally suspect classifications (race, religion, alienage, or national origin) are not at issue, nor are any fundamental constitutional rights at stake, a law must be upheld if there is any “reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification” (United States Railroad Retirement Bd. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:00 pm
Lane v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:36 pm
Again, the case was reversed and remanded, this time by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 May 2012, 2:56 pm
In Salas v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:06 am
Marsh v. [read post]
