Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 9161 - 9180
of 19,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 3:28 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:59 am
In another recent case, Public Impact, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:27 am
" Also, the architect stated plaintiff did not mark the "professional malpractice" when filling out the Civil Case Information Statement. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:15 am
EST in one of the most high-profile cases of the term: Fulton v. [read post]
WantYour Case Decided by a Really Cranky Arbitrator? Litigate Your Case in an Arizona Superior Court
28 Nov 2007, 8:33 am
Mark V. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:09 am
In last week’s decision (Vilardell v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 11:34 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:30 am
The proposal would mark a considerable shift in the traditional role of the Solicitor General. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:29 pm
In its 1985 decision Unocal Corp. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
(See Luzano v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
In the 1973 case of Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
’This morning the Advocate General answered all this questions quite simply: ‘Where conduct occurs via the internet which is liable to infringe a national trade mark registered in a Member State, Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that it attributes jurisdiction: – to the courts of the Member State in which the trade mark is registered [that's presumably good news for Wintersteiger, which has registered its… [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:37 am
Law Society of British Columbia v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 1:49 am
Whether one agrees or not with the analysis of the ECtHR in either case, both might be helpful when it comes to interpreting public policy/morality exclusions in IP law, especially with regard to trade mark applications and copyright enforcement.With regard to trade marks, the test advanced by the ECThR in E.S. v Austria appears in line with the one that the Appointed Person has suggested for UK trade mark applications. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:01 am
Swain v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:28 am
., Serial No. 77432339 [Refusal to register KOOLER KIOSK for "Water cooler attachment for storing, holding and displaying articles" on the alternative grounds of mere descriptiveness or deceptive misdescriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1)].May 6, 2010 - 10 AM: In re Florida State University Credit Union , Serial No. 77415033 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal to register COLLEGIATE COMMUNITY FINANCIAL for "credit union services"].May 11, 2010 - 2 PM: In re DAP… [read post]
