Search for: "U.S. v. Hope*" Results 9161 - 9180 of 9,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2007, 9:31 am
.”   That being said,  we think it was clear the Justices were concerned about the  effects on the reach of U.S. patent law if AT&T were to prevail. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:53 am
It goes something like this:Jury verdict for $800,000 in compensatory damages and $79.5M in punitive damages;Punitive damages reduced by trial court to $32M;Punitive damage award reinstated by Oregon Court of Appeals;Affirmed by Oregon Supreme Court;Remanded by US Supreme Court to decide punitive damages issue in light of its new ruling in State Farm v Campbell;Affirmed again by Oregon Court of Appeals;Affirmed again by Oregon Supreme Court;Now vacated by U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 8:02 am
The most striking example is provided by the balancing test announced in Mathews v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
"[2]  The term "bona fide wellness program" has been repeatedly used in published rules and regulations to refer to programs that will pass muster under the HIPAA exception.[3] In 2001, the Department of Labor, joined by the Treasury and HHS, issued proposed regulations hoping to define "bona fide wellness programs. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Here's a good passage written by Justice O'Connor that ties federalism to the protection of freedom (from Gregory v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 9:11 am
Court of Appeals in a case entitled ACLU v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:22 pm
Apotex's complaint against Glaxo alleges as follows: Glaxo submitted U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
Speaking last week in Florida, Alito conceded that he -- then in the midst of a contentious U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 8:48 am
If we could post normally, we'd have already written about LeGal bitchslapping John Scheich, the juicy Wall Street Journal article on Sullivan & Cromwell's troubles (aside from Charney v. [read post]