Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm
Although the precise circumstances of the instant applications appeared not to have previously arisen, in analogous circumstances where a conviction was based on the law as it was understood to be, a subsequent change in the law would not be a valid ground for leave to appeal out of time unless substantial injustice had been done: R v Benjafield (Karl Robert) (Confiscation Order) (2002) UKHL 2, (2003) 1 AC 1099. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
It was a void agreement because EM's dad clearly knew that she lacked capacity (citing Hart v O'Connor [1985] AC 1000). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
It was a void agreement because EM's dad clearly knew that she lacked capacity (citing Hart v O'Connor [1985] AC 1000). [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 11:03 am
In Matter of Dunn, Lake v M.P.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 8:37 am
In an en banc ruling today in US v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
Of all the domestic cases on the right to education, the most important is A v Head Teacher and Governors of Lord Grey School [2006] UKHL 14, [2006] 2 AC 363; this ruling reinforced the Belgian Linguistics principle that under A2P1 a person is not entitled to some minimum level of education judged by some objective standard and without regard to the system in the particular State. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Following the decision in B & Q [1984] AC 754, 714J it was in order to grant an injunction where it was clear that the criminal penalties available were insufficient to deter continued breaches. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Following the decision in B & Q [1984] AC 754, 714J it was in order to grant an injunction where it was clear that the criminal penalties available were insufficient to deter continued breaches. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:42 am
Commentary comes from Ira Lupu and Bob Tuttle at ACS blog, David Cortman in an op-ed for the St. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:25 am
ProPublica explores states’ varied responses to the Court’s consolidated opinion in Miller v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 6:25 pm
United States International Trade Commission. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:46 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 10:30 pm
That is consistent with the approach of the court in Standard Life Assurance v Ace European Group2012 Lloyds Rep 655 where the court said the phrase “in connection with” is extremely broad and indicates that it is not necessary to show a direct cause or relationship between the claims and the state of affairs identified as their “originating cause or source”. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:36 am
Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd and Jacqueline Lewis) v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:43 am
V. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
In Salazar v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:06 pm
Last Wednesday in Setser v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 10:38 am
Heller & Partners, (1964) AC 465; Caparo v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 1:31 am
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd), heard 12-13 November 2019. [read post]
