Search for: "Above Service Company, Inc." Results 901 - 920 of 3,173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 11:08 am by Ryan P. Blaney and Jonathan Mollod
This enforcement comes only a month after the FTC announced a $1.5 settlement against prescription drug discount provider GoodRx Holdings Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
Urban Health Plan, Inc., 256 AD2d 307 (2nd Dept. 1998); Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
Key Takeaways As noted above, the GoodRx action marks the first instance of the FTC seeking enforcement under the long-dormant HBNR. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:26 am
Rather, his services were provided to CTC by his employer, Venturi Staffing Company, Inc ("Venturi"). [read post]
  This potentially dangerous precedent  could disincentivize companies from taking data security steps if companies cannot get universal application (which is often technically and administratively difficult). [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:56 am
LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE CENTERS, Defendant-Appellee, Separate Appellant, and MANOR CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., JUE-LIN TANG, M.D., and METRO INFECTIOUS DISEASE CONSULTANTS, L.L.C., Defendants. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 5:37 am by Mack Sperling
Jebara Investments, LLC (Mecklenburg)(unassigned): lawsuit regarding a like-kind exchange in which Plaintiff sought to pierce the corporate veil between the attorney handling the transaction and a related title services company. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:39 am
"We are focused on managing our company and serving our customers with excellence," a spokeswoman for the company said. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
The education company complained about the decision arguing that it was not responsible for processing the personal data or for the cookies which Facebook installed. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 7:59 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
Restrictive Covenant Linked to Employee Incentive Program The restrictive covenants at issue in the case, United Health Care Services, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
” None of the foregoing suggests that corporate advertising needs to be above scrutiny. [read post]
For now, we only need the basic name (e.g, “Nike,” not “Nike, Inc. [read post]