Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The Court has applied the doctrine to bank records, in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Opinion below(7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-769 Title: United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm
Should social media platforms be subject to a statutory duty of care, akin to occupiers’ liability or health and safety, with the aim of protecting against online harms? [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:32 pm
Gas Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:23 am
From an amicus brief in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 12:24 pm
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:19 am
Kelley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
California and United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 6:16 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
Giving the majority judgment, Lady Hale stated that the standard required when reviewing a contractual decision is akin to that adopted for judicial review of administrative action, and held that the court will imply a contractual term into the contract that the decision making process be “lawful and rational in the public law sense” (paragraph 30), but that recourse should of course be had to the context of the particular contract. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
Iskanian v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
Iskanian v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Iskanian v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:51 am
Iskanian v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
Iskanian v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:02 pm
The landscape changed drastically in 2010 when the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Finally, the Court will weigh a petition from the state of South Carolina — Stewart v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
This effectively reverses State v. [read post]
