Search for: "Alexander v. State" Results 901 - 920 of 2,338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
The court also noted that an appellate court in Wisconsin had rejected Alexander’s theory, in construing a similar statute in State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:39 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Samuel Alito delivers a summary of his opinion in Ayestas v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
The 186th edition of the IPKat’s news roundup.DesignsKat friends Nina O’Sullivan and Victoria Wilson reported on the 2017 key design cases brought before both the EU and the UK’s courts in The best and the brightest: key UK and EU design decisions from 2017.Speaking of key decisions, following the DOCERAM v CeramTec CJEU judgement (C-395/16), Kat friend Alexander Haertel discusses the decision in detail and its possible repercussions in German design law on the… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:01 am by SHG
The distinction between the Supreme Court’s judgment and precedent is often conflated due to Cooper v. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am by INFORRM
  Here, though, it is a question of horizontal (person to person) rather than vertical rights (state to individual). [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
A company called dkcb Pty Ltd opted to bring a auDRP complaint in 2017 (dkcb Pty Ltd v Eveready Pty Ltd). [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
A company called dkcb Pty Ltd opted to bring a auDRP complaint in 2017 (dkcb Pty Ltd v Eveready Pty Ltd). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
 It is the intention-free existence of the text, not its being ambiguous or unambiguous, that Alexander calls into question. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
 It is the intention-free existence of the text, not its being ambiguous or unambiguous, that Alexander calls into question. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
| Bad faith confirmed for ALEXANDER trade mark application? [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:34 am
Chaired by Alexandre Rudoni (Allen & Overy), the panellists for the session were Alexander Benesch (Nintendo), Andrea Dufaure (Allen & Overy), Willy Duhen (Activision Blizzard), Andreas Lober (Beiten Burkhardt),Paul Gardner (Wiggin) and Andrea Rizzi (Osborne Clarke).Technical Protective Measures (TPMs)Speaking from his first hand experience in enforcing copyright and TPMs, Alexander Benesch gave a presentation which explained the current state of the law in respect… [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
| Bad faith confirmed for ALEXANDER trade mark application? [read post]