Search for: "Ali v. State" Results 901 - 920 of 1,247
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 20, 2011), and the class action case, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm by Bridget Crawford
[2] “Dear Colleague” Letter from Ass’t Sec’y for Civil Rights Russlynn Ali, Oct. 26, 2010 [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:24 am by John Bellinger
While everyone has been focused on Libya war powers over the last few days, the DC Circuit issued an interesting opinion on Tuesday in an Alien Tort Statute suit (Ali Shafi v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The appellant’s brief in the case al-Zahrani et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:48 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The district court dismissed the actions for failure to state a claim within the jurisdiction conferred by the ATS. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:54 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s a link to an AP article on the Army Times‘ website analyzing yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:15 pm by Michelle Lindo McCluer
 At this assertion, Judge Sims asked whether any case law stating just that. [read post]
29 May 2011, 4:21 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  By far the more significant of the two is United States v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 10:39 am by Dwight Sullivan
  The argument is scheduled for 1000 in front of Judges Tozzi, Sims, and Gallagher in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:51 am by admin
However, a misrepresentation that was not the fault of the applicant and not material to the administration of Canada’s immigration laws and was corrected before a decision was made, was deemed to not to be  a material misrepresentation as per the case of ali Anwar Ali v MCI 2008 FC 166. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:12 am by Dwight Sullivan
On Thursday, NMCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles at issue in a case called United States v. [read post]