Search for: "BENNETT v. STATE"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:00 am
” Wells Bennett linked us to an interesting little order in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
Secretary of state for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Michelle Donelan welcomed President Biden’s executive order implementing the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:51 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:45 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Sonny Hoskins v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Gardner and Gardner v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 11:30 am
Additional Resources: Howard v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:54 am
In 2006, the Full Federal Court concluded in the Grant case (Grant v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm
Flagan, 261 Ga. 41 (1991); Bennett v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 4:52 am
” In re CP Ships, at 7 (quoting Bennett v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
Tim Edgar examined the Schrems v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 3:56 am
California (1960) and McIntyre v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:48 pm
– Brian Burris Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
The Court referred to Bennett v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
On 21 April 2022, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei published a declaration establishing the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
†In the case of State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 11:41 am
One possibility would be to state up-front what they would do if they obtained majority control to ensure Cato’s independence. [read post]
