Search for: "Belt v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2018, 10:41 am
The women were all wearing their seat belts, but according to state highway patrol investigators, it didn’t matter because the impact to the passenger side was so severe and so deep. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 12:11 pm
Radtke, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:21 pm
Franklin in the first paragraph of Franklin v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:34 am
He has 15 Supreme Court arguments under his belt, including Hamdan v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court took up the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:53 am
These considerations come even more alive in the context of the ambitious transnational project of the Belt & Road Initiative. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:54 pm
In Sirbaugh v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
A consumer searching for e-cigarettes, when faced with a mark with a reputation for clothing and jewellery, will not make the required link necessary to succeed under Article 8(5) EUTMR because the goods are completely different.The decisionEarlier trade marks with a reputation in a Member State enjoy extended protection in accordance with Article 8(5) EUTMR. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:43 am
The decision from two weeks ago—a Friday—in LaBarre v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:15 am
Years later, that Supreme Court decision, Korematsu v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:38 am
But nonetheless, this belt-and-braces approach has made its way into the DPA 2018. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:55 am
(and its subsequent case, Musnuff v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Thermo-Ply, Inc (Patently-O) 7th Circuit rejects Zippo sliding scale for personal jurisdiction: Poulsen Roser A/S v. [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 12:11 pm
Nagla v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:53 am
Hutchinson noted here back in 1993, Article 102 is most often honored in the breach, and has little relevance today to determining the legal status of an agreement (the ICJ appears to have agreed with him based on its holdings in the jurisdictional phase of Qatar v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:30 am
We've kept our own fiscal house in order, preparing responsibly for the downturn with eight different belt tightenings over the last three years, while spending in Albany has continued to spiral out of control. [read post]
