Search for: "Bishop v Bishop"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2012, 11:07 pm
[Note: This post is Part V of a series on amending the BCP and adopting trial or experimental liturgies for use in the Church, as we head into General Convention LXXVII later this week. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Bishop v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Tiberius Capital, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Tiberius Capital, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
Many other Bishops may not be aware of it just now, but they are going to face plenty of storms in their own dioceses after they return.This is not like General Convention 2003, when people had to read the news about the confirmation of V. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
See Frantz v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
See Frantz v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:10 am
(October 16 is the date on which the Court has set the Masterson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
Nor is it a Resolution to provide rites for a "special occasion" which a single Bishop could authorize in accordance with the Canons of General Convention, or the Rubrics. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 2:23 pm
The Court declined to hear Seven-Sky v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court has agreed to hear the appeal of Georgia-Pacific (GP) West, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:55 pm
Power In Doe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
” Forrester v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
In Watson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:55 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 7:56 pm
The Supreme Court's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
According to Keith Paul Bishop this could be a real problem because the status of investors may change or the securities may be transferred to different investors. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 6:59 pm
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop (pdf) [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:21 am
In Watson v. [read post]
