Search for: "Blake v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 986
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2007, 7:27 am
Gould way back in 2001, years before Blakely v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:23 pm
Ct. at 1381, quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
The latter point is especially unpersuasive: in the Sixth Amendment arena, not a single Circuit anticipated Apprendi or Blakely. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 11:42 am
(Link to Cases): For publication opinions today (4): Ronald Lee Blake, Jr. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:41 pm
The panel notes that it can't address United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
If this is giving you a feeling of queasy familiarity after Justice O'Connor's prescient Blakely dissent, you are not alone. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
Then came Booker (argued in the Supreme Court by TChris who writes at TalkLeft) in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:12 am
Apprendi, Blakely and now Cunningham ... the A,B,C of jury trial rights now includes three cases striking down state sentencing laws giving state judges undue authority to find facts to increase sentences. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
"In all material respects, California's DSL resembles the sentencing systems invalidated" in Blakely v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 11:20 am
US v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 8:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:53 am
However, I find it hard to square with his vote in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
New Jersey lawyer Steven Sanders, who has long been thoughtfully examining the issue of how to deal with Blakely errors, sent me this thoughtful comment about Justice Scalia's curious work yesterday in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:13 pm
US v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:20 pm
Stewart, in which the Court declined to rule on the question of whether the sentencing decision in Blakely v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:15 am
The Court's per curiam ruling in Burton v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:29 am
Here is Lyle's early report:[T]he Court declined to rule on the question of whether the sentencing decision in Blakely v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:03 am
In a second decision, the Court declined to rule on the question of whether the sentencing decision in Blakely v. [read post]
