Search for: "Branch v. United States"
Results 901 - 920
of 4,103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2012, 7:15 pm
The second one, State University of New York v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:02 pm
Last year, the January 6 committee requested certain documents from the Archivist of the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 2:58 pm
“The term ‘United States’ in § 2241(e)(2) refers to the Executive Branch, not the Judicial Branch,” Judge Leon stated, “[t]hus, the determinations of the two separate CSRTs . . . more than satisfy the statutory requirements. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 7:36 pm
This Court never has formally addressed the question of whether state court rulings eliminating formerly established property rights can effect a taking, or violate an owner's due process rights, under the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am
The court also cited a United States Supreme Court case, Arthur v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
It was also distinguishable from the use of private property for the purposes of collecting signatures for a petition (Appleby v United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, 6 May 2003) or the general prohibition on a ship entering the State’s territorial waters for campaigning purposes (Women on Waves v Portugal, no. 31276/05, 3 February 2009). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:26 pm
Yesterday three U.S. government agencies--the Antitrust Division (ATR) of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--invited stakeholders to submit comments by early January on a new draft policy statement on standard-essential patents (SEPs).I applaud the Biden Administration for taking--at least this stage--a very centrist position. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm
The court held that the Regulations left no room for doubt that the ruling of a home Member State should be recognised and given effect elsewhere and, accordingly, a ruling in winding-up proceedings by an EEA member state should, to the extent that the ruling was final and binding in that country, be recognised and given effect in the United Kingdom. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 1:18 pm
Plaintiffs offer undisputed evidence that the President of the United States has openly and often expressed his desire to ban those of Islamic faith from entering the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
Fisher: “Congress may exclude aliens of a particular race from the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:25 pm
First, by contemplating an extension of the current law that precludes anyone from GTMO being brought into the United States for any purpose, making the same rule apply generally to all overseas captures (notice that Warsame appears not to have been taken to GTMO, no doubt at least in part in order to avoid the GTMO “tar pit” effect in which Congress won’t let anyone get out anymore; ironically, in fact, it may be that Congress’s efforts to force the… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
This case is not an ordinary case because the party to be joined is a branch of a US State. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 3:57 am
“In 2008, the plaintiff commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (hereinafter the District Court), alleging, inter alia, that the City of New York, the New York City Police Department, and individual police officers (hereinafter collectively the City defendants) violated his constitutional rights, violated 42 USC § 1983, and committed the state torts of false arrest, malicious prosecution, and… [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 7:00 am
The firm represents clients throughout North Carolina and the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
Aultman (1898) and United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
(2) Is the Presidency an "office ... under the United States? [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 4:34 pm
The main body of the Geneva Conventions do not apply to U.S. citizens held by the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:56 am
In Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
[United States v. [read post]
