Search for: "Bunch v State" Results 901 - 920 of 1,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am by Beck, et al.
Is a joinder of a whole bunch of plaintiffs from different states a fraudulent misjoinder when the only thing they have in common is that they claim the same kind of injury from the same product? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
We have a whole bunch of ideas about confusion that are hard to link to cognizable harm, but courts tend to assume that confusion is itself harm. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Overriding Pennsylvania law to permit cross-jurisdictional class action tolling in federal court of state law economic loss claims.Stone v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:54 am by Christopher Sagers
Should a state really be allowed to just give a bunch of essentially private persons license to constrain their markets? [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by John Elwood
State-on-top habeas case Woods v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
The most high-profile case of the bunch is City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
GAT v LuK) and Case C-539/03 Roche Nederland BV and Others v Frederick Primus and Milton Goldenberg (noted here by the IPKat). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:24 am by Guest Blogger
”[v] In making this point, Farmer cited the earlier case of DeShaney v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]