Search for: "Bush v. Gore" Results 901 - 920 of 1,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 9:00 am by Record on Appeal
" Regarding civility, Justice Thomas is quoted as saying: "In that room, when we discuss First Amendment, abortion, Second Amendment, death penalty, pre-emption, commerce clause, the cases of great consequence -- Bush v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 5:19 am
Rather than ridicule formalistic statements by conservative judges, let's applaud them, then hold the judges to their avowed legal formalism, vociferously criticizing decisions that appear to be politically driven (remember Bush v Gore!) [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm by Amanda Frost
  (Starting with Bush v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 4:01 pm by brettb
Republicans have no problem with an activist court when it asserts itself into state election law as it did in Bush v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 7:55 am
  One might in good faith wonder, for instance, whether any of the justices who decided Bush v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:20 am by David Oscar Markus
Thomas Law Review have put together a symposium next weekend (November 12-13, 2010) entitled Bush v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:36 am by Rick Hasen
Today’s New York Times piece shows that these ideas now are getting a full airing, and that the ACA ruling will be tied, along with Citizens United and Bush v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:09 am
The Recorder is reporting that Theodore Olsen and David Boies, former opponents from the Bush v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 3:35 pm
Kalman, consider checking a few of her journal articles (available on HeinOnline):The (Un) Bearable Liteness of E-Mail: Historians, Impeachment and Bush v Gore, 4 Theoretical Inq. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:15 pm
" With LightSquared's cellular prospects looking increasingly dim, the company recently bolstered its legal staff by hiring Bush v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 4:07 pm
Over at Yale's www.thepocketpart.org, my friend Chad Flanders (Yale 3L) has this post up on the precedential value of Bush v. [read post]