Search for: "CAMPBELL v CAMPBELL" Results 901 - 920 of 3,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 9:03 am by Ad Law Defense
Aug. 12, 2016) (Coconut Oil); Campbell v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:03 am by Ad Law Defense
Aug. 12, 2016) (Coconut Oil); Campbell v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Come prepared for a lively, interactive workshop.World Café Hosts:Dayna Matthew, University of Colorado Law SchoolCharity Scott, Georgia State University College of LawSidney Watson, Saint Louis University School of LawInvited Discussants and Participants:Rodney Adams, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Health AdministrationChristina Juris Bennett, University of Oklahoma College of LawAmy Campbell, University of Memphis Cecil C. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Last week’s decision of the Appellate Division, First Department, in Campbell v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The top ten posts of the term were as follows (in descending order) Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Libel Trial, Day 3: Claimants closing submissions, judgment reserved Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell How to avoid defamation – Steven Price How Dacre and the Mail are making the case for section 40 – Brian… [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Court declined to decide between its decision in Campbell v MGN (No. 2) [2005] UKHL 61 (upholding CFAs in media cases) and MGN v UK 39401/04 [2011] ECHR 919 (holding that the recovery of additional liabilities was incompatible with the right to freedom of expression in Article 10) and moved the bastion for CFA clients and their lawyers to Article 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention (“A1P1”). [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:19 pm by Dan Flynn
 One would repeal the so-called “Chevron” doctrine, so named for a 1984 Supreme Court case of Chevron USA v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:24 am by INFORRM
In the case of Times Newspapers Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; and, Frost and others v MGN Ltd ([2017] UKSC 33), the defendant media organisations each brought an appeal to the Supreme Court in relation to the obligation that they pay additional liabilities in cases engaging their right to freedom of expression. [read post]