Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
Because, typically, in any given week, there's something -- often, many things -- with which to disagree in the published decisions of the Ninth Circuit and California Court of Appeal. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 3:39 pm
The case thus came to the 10th Circuit on cross-appeals by the parties. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
That’s what a Minnesota statute — now being challenged before the Minnesota Court of Appeals — does: Subdivision 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 11:27 am
To make this argument, the plaintiff/cross appellant effectively asked the court of appeal to reverse its earlier decision on this very issue: Valley Advocates v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
California, 134 S. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
Penney (No. 2:14-cv-02565) is a case held by the Central District of California. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
Rominger v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
§ 1915(g), a district court’s dismissal of a lawsuit counts as a “strike” while it is still pending on appeal or before the time for seeking appellate review has passed. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:54 pm
Apple withdrew its cross-appeal, so the only party still fighting for an improvement is Samsung. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm
In the second part of its opinion, the Court affirmed the analysis of its prior decision in Valley Advocates v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Levitt v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:39 pm
The Federal Circuit adopted Judge Posner's claim construction of this patent in Apple v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:51 am
Abbott Town of Atherton v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm
This is a very significant setback for Apple, which less than six months ago had already failed, despite a partly-successful appeal, to obtain a sales ban against Samsung in the first California litigation between the two companies, an outcome that Apple accepted as final about a month ago when it withdrew its related cross-appeal.The denial of an injunction following the recent trial in the second California case is based on Apple's failure to satisfy the… [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:06 pm
The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment, thereby rendering the cross-appeal mo [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 10:50 am
Hart In California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:09 am
California’s New Law Shows It’s Not Easy To Regulate Revenge Porn (Forbes Cross-Post) Facebook Posting That Someone Has Herpes Is Criminal Harassment–Pennsylvania v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 6:38 pm
The district court granted his motion for judgment of acquittal for a (heavy) Section 924(c) charge, and the Ninth affirmed against the government’s cross-appeal. [read post]
