Search for: "Cable One, Inc." Results 901 - 920 of 1,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2009, 1:57 pm by Tom B
As someone who has litigated intellectual property cases, I can tell you that these cases are never as simple as they might seem to a lay person, especially when one only has access to one side of the story. [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:43 pm by ~
The final rule set forth: (1) that a requestfor exclusion must be accompanied by evidence that willmeet the statutory test for the exclusion outlined above;and (2) that the EXHR staff would evaluate the evidence andprovide a scientific recommendation to the Commission as towhether the party submitting the request had met thisstatutory test.The Specialty Vehicle Institute of America (SVIA),Polaris Industries, Inc., American Suzuki MotorCorporation, Arctic Cat Inc., Bombardier… [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:13 am
No one who knows the actual word "fuck" is either fooled or protected by such substitutions. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  The group planned to broadcast one of the ads on Fox News cable network, and on other TV networks. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP)   Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property)   Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda)   Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46)   Russia Video… [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:05 am
Wyko had never built one of the machines before, the indictment said.So Howell and Roberts traveled to Kansas. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:01 am by Ryan McCabe
., Inc., 2008 N.E.2d 549 (N.Y. 2008), the Court of Appeals of New York interpreted a New York statute that stated, in essence, that a promise related to a construction contract meant to hold the promisee (the one to whom the promise is being made) not liable for injuries resulting from the promisee's or the promisee's agents' negligence was against public policy. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]