Search for: "California v. Nevada" Results 901 - 920 of 1,232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2011, 9:49 pm by Alex Gasser
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: • FloLight, LLC of Campbell, California • Prompter People, Inc. of Campbell, California • IKAN Corporation of Houston, Texas • Advanced Business Computer Services, LLC of Reno, Nevada • Elation Lighting, Inc. of Los Angeles, California • Fotodiox Inc. of Waukegan, Illinois… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:45 pm by David Kravets
Circuit Court of Appeals, the nation’s largest federal appeals court, is based in San Francisco and covers nine western states, including Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
California Coastal Commission did not apply to the ordinance where the ordinance did not require Watson to dedicate any portion of his property to either the City's or the public's use. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am by Marie Louise
Google (Copyright Litigation Blog) 9th Circuit: Specific California jurisdiction over Ohio celebrity gossip website publishing Black-Eyed Peas infringing photographs: Mavrix Photo Inc. v Brand Technologies (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Federal Court Nevada: Righthaven rocked, owes $34,000 after ‘fair use’ loss: Righthaven v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 7,972,022 (the ‘022 patent), 7,510,290 (the ‘290 patent), 7,429,117 (the ‘117 patent), 7,318,652 (the ‘652 patent), and 6,948,823 (the ‘823 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): FloLight, LLC of Campbell, California Prompter People, Inc. of Campbell, California Ikan Corporation of Houston, Texas Advanced Business Computer Services, LLC of Reno, Nevada Elation Lighting, Inc. of Los Angeles, California… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm by Mandelman
In California, for example, in the appellate court’s decision in Gomes v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Democratic Underground (Electronic Frontier Foundation) District Court N D California: 17 USC 512(f) preempts state law claims over bogus copyright takedown notices: Amaretto v. [read post]