Search for: "Call v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 55,347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2023, 7:05 am
Harper (the so-called independent state legislature (ISL) case) already argued at the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2022, 2:24 pm
[1] Facebook v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 2:24 pm
[1] Facebook v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
Facts of Box v Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc While he was governor of Indiana, Vice President Mike Pence signed a new law regulating abortions in the state. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
Finally, Part V summarizes the implications of the Trump v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted directly or indirectly… [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 5:17 am
It begins: "Although some have called United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:03 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
A new blog sponsored by Thompson Reuters called On The Case has an interesting post on the ramifications of the Ninth Circuit's CAFA decision handed down last week, Washington v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:00 pm
United States, No. 13-9026. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:47 am
The two consolidated cases before us call for interpretation of §924(c) as that provision was reformulated in 1998.... [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:56 pm
In response to my call for thoughts on Judge Baker's dissent in Erasmo Leyva, Jr. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:04 pm
In Norris v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:17 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
In Cohen v California, 403 U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm
Which gets called out by Chief Judge Kozinski for (1) doing a bad job, and then (2) trying to get out the consequences of this (alleged) malfeasance by convincing -- successfully, I might add -- three district court judges down here (Judges Burns, Benitez, and Collins) to refuse to accept the unconditional guilty pleas of various criminal defendants.No dice, he holds. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 3:45 pm
In State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]