Search for: "Carle v. Carle"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 10:58 am
My good friend Carl Varnedoe will be arguing for the Plaintiff and my good friend Pat O’Connor will be arguing for the City of Richmond. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
” SEC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Brinker and Dukes v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:16 am
LFC Corporate Services, Inc., Opposition No. 91181109 [Section 2(d) opposition to LFC, LFC.COM, and LFC ONLINE for various real estate services, in view of several LF marks for real estate services].June 29, 2010 - 11 AM: In re Carl Walther GmbH, Serial No. 77096523 [Sections 1, 2 and 45 refusal to register the product configuration shown below for "Firearms; pistols; air pistols; and air soft guns" on the ground that the mark is non-distinctive and will not be recognized as a… [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 7:08 am
Ass'n v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:31 am
Departments BenchPressJessica Steingard New Resources at CPLEALesley Conley Columns Criminal LawMelody IzadiVIP Access to Justice: Why state-funded counsel is crucial to our democratic identity Employment LawPeter Bowal and James RaganBad Behaviour 4.0: Employees getting away with … Family LawJohn-Paul BoydAlternatives to Court: Parenting Coordination Famous CasesPeter Bowal, Danny Li and Carl WalkerWhiten v Pilot Insurance Human Rights LawLinda… [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:58 am
My good friend Carl Varnedoe will be arguing for the Plaintiff and my good friend Pat O’Connor will be arguing for the City of Richmond. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 3:35 am
Larry O'Dell, Associated Press Writer, Richmond, Va. wrote about a recent Virginia Court of Appeals ruling, Stroud v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
Consider the recent Hanover County case of Koegler v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 12:45 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:54 am
Carl McCall. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:50 am
S. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
Carl McCall for damages, claiming that McCall had terminated him in retaliation for his exercising his right to free speech in violation of his civil rights. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:01 am
The Supreme Court has heard a lot of preemption suits, but Tuesday’s arguments in Armstrong v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
MySpace and Doe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 8:07 am
Players: Big win by AFPDs Dean Gits and Carl Gunn. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Carl Hagwood represented the defendants. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:52 pm
., v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:09 am
(Berlinger v. [read post]
