Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 4,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2014, 2:50 am
The tragic risks exist even at that level of are more than obvious as I saw a Rutgers player crack his neck on the MetLife Stadium field in the Rutgers v Army game a couple of years ago.Todays post is shared from the nytime.com/. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
This morning the CJEU (second chamber) handed down judgement in case C-98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA,Manufacture des Montres Rolex SAThe point at issue before the CJEU (set out in a series of questions which the court condensed to a single answer) was that, in the scenario where somebody purchased from a non-EU website counterfeit goods (in this case, a fake Rolex), could these be seized by customs, it being apparently common ground that the Customs Regulation… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:09 pm
Maruko v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:04 am
On March 2, 2011, the Supreme Court established in Snyder v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:38 am
Chambers et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – April 17th, 2019) involves a motor vehicle accident between an automobile and a tractor-trailer. [read post]
15 May 2008, 4:38 am
Here is a "brief chambers opinion" from Judge Newman: Bennett, petitioner v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
We are very grateful to Alice Irving of Doughty Street Chambers for the following note of a judgment in the Administrative Court on an application for interim relief. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
Parts are "common" if they are for shared, rather than individual benefit: Marfield Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment [1996] SCLR 749. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
Parts are "common" if they are for shared, rather than individual benefit: Marfield Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment [1996] SCLR 749. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
CONNOLLY, J.P., CHAMBERS, DOWLING and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
CONNOLLY, J.P., CHAMBERS, DOWLING and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:05 am
The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed the Oregon State Board of Nursing (OSBN) in the case of Shank v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:54 am
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 11:41 am
In El Masri v Macedonia the complainant, Khalid El Masri (left)—a Lebanese national but German resident—will claim that Macedonia’s refusal to instigate a full and proper investigation of his rendition, together with the state’s direct involvement in the rendition itself, constitute a breach of the Convention. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:30 pm
Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Motion for leave to file and amicus brief of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar Motion for leave to file and amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:20 am
" PROSECUTOR V. [read post]
