Search for: "Commonwealth v. Long" Results 901 - 920 of 1,066
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2015, 8:00 am by Kelly Buchanan
Here is its long title: “An Act to place certain restrictions on Immigration and to provide for the removal from the Commonwealth of prohibited Immigrants. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Supreme Court held more than a decade ago in Swidler & Berlin v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:26 am by NBlack
For example, the Massachusetts Appeals Court issued an opinion earlier this month, Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:15 am by Wally Zimolong
 (Readers of this blog will note that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania recently issued a similar rule on 100% state funded projects.) [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am by Colin Murray
  Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am by Colin Murray
  Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Andrew Hudson
Appeal to the High Court The Commonwealth (through the Comptroller General of Customs) subsequently sought leave to appeal the decision of the Full Federal Court to the High Court. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
I think this is the kind of thing that Judge Easterbrook was getting at in this excerpt from his 1988 opinion in Weilgos v. [read post]