Search for: "Courts v. Smart" Results 901 - 920 of 2,901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic took a look at the recent confirmation from the Swedish Supreme Court that the storage of infringing goods with a view to sell them might trigger both civil and criminal liability in a recent case.InternKat Antonella Gentile looked into the decision of the General Court of the European Union (GC) in its judgment in KID-Systeme v EUIPO - Sky (SKYFi) T-354/18 that gave the GC the opportunity to analyse the… [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:41 am
Because Palin was unable to name a Supreme Court decision other than Roe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 11:00 am
If you're looking for the latest scoop on Charney v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit recently issued an interesting opinion in a civil suit:  Huff v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:37 am
  Today's just a lesson that it pays to know smart people, because sometimes they can get you out of jams. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
In other words, they're smart and articulate and intelligent enough to defend themselves, but the actual content of their legal beliefs gets in the way of their defense. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
 Jason, who used to litigate smartphone patents before they were smart has metamorphosed into a general commercial litigator. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am by Eric Goldman
The court acknowledges the Supermedia case but, perhaps surprisingly, does not discuss Barrett v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
My goal was to eventually be half as smart and hardworking as he was (and is), and I'm proud to say that I'm almost a tenth of the way there.But even though Professor Tribe is an incredibly active appellate advocate, it's been over a half decade since he's graced either the Ninth Circuit or California Supreme Court/Court of Appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:24 pm by Craig Whitney
  The Second Circuit affirmed the decision, relying on that court’s earlier decision in Cartoon Network LP v. [read post]