Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 901 - 920
of 29,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
The defendant explained that the DTSA has a three year statute of limitations and contains language that provides: “[f]or purposes of this subsection, a continuing misappropriation constitutes a single claim of misappropriation. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:02 am
Swiss-drug major F. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 10:02 am
Du,No. 05-1288, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Heartwood 88, 637 F.3d 750 (7th Cir. 2011). [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
Introcaso, __ F.3d __, 2007 WL 3104382 (filed October 25, 2007), the Court reversed the defendant's conviction for possessing an unregistered firearm - a 19th-century shotgun that had been hanging in his living room, holding that the definition of "antique firearm" under the statute, 26 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2006, 1:30 pm
Zippo Dot Com, Inc., 952 F. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:35 pm
Payton, 159 F.3d 49, 56 (2d Cir.1998). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
” Bateman, 623 F.3d at 716. [read post]
19 May 2024, 6:51 am
This constraint significantly hinders Ukraine’s ability to defend itself effectively. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 2:25 am
Ahrendt, 560 F.3d 69 (1st Cir. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:07 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312 (Fed. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 8:01 am
Armstrong, _ F.3d _ (5th Cir. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:52 am
Group, Inc., 418 F. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:04 am
Casper, 536 F.3d 409 (5th Cir. 2008), vacated and remanded, 129 S. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Defendant Has No First Amendment Right to Wear "Black Lives Matter" T-Shirt at Trial
22 Feb 2019, 2:41 pm
Gilbert, 920 F.2d 878, 884 (11th Cir. 1991) (holding courthouses are nonpublic forums). [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:17 am
Cornejo-Sandoval,No. 08-2070, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 3:37 pm
Daniel F. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
Compare Appel, 250 F.3d at 217–18 (holding retrospective analysis of a defendant's competency is not an appropriate remedy for a deprivation of counsel violation), with Klat, 156 F.3d at 1264 (remanding “for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the competency hearing could have come out differently if [the defendant] had been represented by counsel”), and United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:08 am
Gateway, Inc., 580 F.3d 1301 (Fed. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 8:32 am
Trans Union, L.L.C., 402 F.3d 340 (2d Cir.2005). [read post]
